Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:50
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Can Japan hold on to its ‘indispensable’ companies? - Financial Times
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why does Boko Haram attack its own Muslims?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Modern Diesel Engines Still Outsell Gas In Heavy-Duty Trucks: Here's Why - Jalopnik
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is the future of artificial intelligence?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
AI Cracks Mars Mystery: 500,000 Streaks Solved Without a Drop of Water - SciTechDaily
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do you make a karaoke version of a song?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.